01 / CRYPTO
Crypto merchant accounts, without the guesswork.
We match crypto businesses - exchanges, brokers, wallet and custody services, and ordinary merchants that want to accept crypto - with processors whose underwriting actually fits the business model, the licensing and the checkout. Then we walk you through the application, the pricing, the reserve and the contract terms.
Free to use · Team responds ASAP · We’re paid by the processor, not you.
The short version
- A crypto merchant account is not one thing. It’s three: a business that sells crypto or crypto services, a business that exchanges crypto for fiat, and an ordinary high-risk merchant that just wants to accept crypto next to cards. Each is underwritten by a different desk, against different rules, at a different price.
- Conflating the three is the most common reason crypto applications die. A wallet app, a bitcoin ATM operator and a supplement brand taking stablecoin at checkout are not comparable files. Applying to the same place tells underwriters you don’t know which business you run.
- Card rates on crypto-adjacent, high-risk merchants typically run 3% to 6% per transaction. Crypto gateway fees typically run 0.5% to 2%.
- Rolling reserves of 5% to 10%, held 90 to 180 days, are normal wherever cards are involved. Pure on-chain settlement usually carries no reserve, because there is nothing left to charge back.
- On-chain transactions can’t be reversed. Card-funded crypto purchases and hybrid checkouts can. Visa’s Acquirer Monitoring Program “Excessive” threshold for a merchant sits at 1.5% as of April 1, 2026, and that ratio counts card transactions only.
- Licensing is the question that decides your file. In the US that usually means FinCEN MSB registration plus state money transmitter licences; for EU-facing operations, MiCA CASP authorisation.
- Approval is never guaranteed, and nobody who tells you otherwise has read your file. What we do is get you in front of underwriting that already boards the category.
- We’re free to use. We’re paid by the processor when a merchant we match starts processing.
Find my processor ↗02 / THREE BUSINESSES, ONE LABEL
Three different businesses, one label.
Start here, because everything downstream depends on it.
Search “crypto merchant account” and you get one page that means three things. A crypto exchange looking for card rails to fund purchases. A bitcoin ATM operator looking for a settlement account. A skincare brand that wants a “pay with crypto” button next to its card fields. Those three businesses share a word and almost nothing else.
Underwriting knows the difference, even when the merchant doesn’t. Each type carries a different risk, a different regulatory posture and a different set of documents that prove you’re allowed to do what you do. When a merchant describes itself as “a crypto company” and applies to the wrong door, the file doesn’t get repriced - it gets declined, usually with no explanation, because the processor’s model has no box that fits.
Here’s how the three actually split.
(a) You sell crypto or crypto services
You’re a broker, an exchange, a custodial wallet, a trading platform, a mining operation or a software business selling to crypto companies. The card transaction, when there is one, usually funds a customer’s account or pays for a subscription to your platform.
This is the hardest file in the category. The processor is underwriting a financial-services business with market exposure, a customer base the networks treat as fraud-prone, and a licensing footprint that has to match every jurisdiction you serve. Mainstream acquirers route this straight to a specialist desk, and plenty of those desks still won’t board it. Your licence status is not paperwork here - it is the underwriting.
The card network angle is specific, too. Card-funded crypto purchases sit in a quasi-cash category the networks watch closely, and Visa’s own issuer guidance treats crypto fraud as its own pattern. Some issuers code a crypto purchase as a cash advance - that is the issuer’s call, not yours, but it changes how cardholders behave and how disputes land.
(b) You exchange crypto for fiat
You’re running something closer to money transmission: a customer gives you value in one form and you deliver it in another. Swap services, on-ramps and off-ramps, payment processors, OTC desks and remittance-style flows all land here.
Under US rules this is the category where FinCEN’s money transmitter framework lands hardest. FinCEN’s 2013 virtual currency guidance and its 2019 consolidated CVC guidance treat a business that accepts and transmits convertible virtual currency, or buys and sells it, as a money transmitter - an MSB - unless an exception or limitation applies. That triggers registration, an AML programme, recordkeeping and reporting. Most states then layer their own money transmitter licence on top.
For a processor, “you exchange” means you hold customer funds, you touch counterparty risk, and you have a compliance obligation that is either documented or it isn’t. A file with a clean licensing posture and a real AML programme gets read seriously. A file that says “we’re not sure if we need a licence” ends the conversation early, and reasonably so.
(c) You’re an ordinary high-risk business that accepts crypto
You sell supplements, adult content, travel, telemedicine, tutoring, high-ticket coaching, or anything else that already sits in a high-risk box. You want to add a crypto payment option alongside cards, or next to a card option a processor just shut off.
This is the file with the most options and the least regulatory exposure. You are not a money transmitter in most configurations - you’re a merchant who accepts an asset as payment and delivers a product. Your licensing question is usually narrower, your MCC stays close to what it already was, and the crypto leg is often settled through a third-party gateway that carries the crypto-side compliance for you.
If you’re in group (c), read the sections on accepting crypto alongside cards and pricing before anything else. If you’re in (a) or (b), keep going - the licensing and chargeback sections matter more to you.
Why conflating them gets applications declined
We see the same three mistakes over and over.
- 01
The merchant describes a group (c) business in group (a) language. “We’re a crypto company” reads as a financial-services file. Now the processor wants licences that an ecommerce brand never needed, and the merchant can’t produce them. The decline is generated by the description, not by the business.
- 02
A group (b) business applies to a card-first high-risk processor. The processor’s acquiring bank boards merchants, not money transmitters. There’s no product there, however good the file is.
- 03
A group (a) business applies to five crypto gateways at once. Each gateway is a different company with different rules, and a cluster of simultaneous applications looks like distress. Two well-matched applications beat eight scattershot ones.
Fix the description before you fix anything else. Say plainly what you sell, what you custody, whether you convert one asset into another, and whether a card is ever involved. That single paragraph is what gets your file routed to the right underwriter.
03 / WHY CRYPTO GETS DECLINED
Why crypto businesses get declined.
Most crypto merchants who get turned down assume the problem is crypto itself. Sometimes it is. More often it’s a mismatch between a real business and a risk model built for a different one. Five things do most of the damage.
- 01
Regulatory uncertainty. Crypto rules move, and they don’t move uniformly. A US-facing exchange is reading FinCEN and fifty state regulators; an EU-facing one is reading MiCA. A processor has to decide what a business will be allowed to do for the life of the contract, not just on the day of application. When the answer is genuinely unsettled, the honest underwriting response is often “not yet,” and that’s what you get.
- 02
Licensing gaps. This is the single most fixable decline reason and the most common self-inflicted one. A business that should be a registered MSB, or hold state money transmitter licences, or hold MiCA CASP authorisation, and doesn’t, is unboardable no matter how clean the rest of the file looks. We cover the specifics below.
- 03
Volatility. A merchant whose revenue is denominated in an asset that can move 20% in a week is a different credit risk from one whose revenue is in dollars. Settlement timing compounds it: if you settle in crypto and pay your suppliers in fiat, a two-day window can be a real loss. Processors price volatility through reserve size and settlement frequency, and some route around it by settling in fiat only.
- 04
Fraud exposure. Cards used to buy crypto are disproportionately stolen cards and coerced cardholders. That’s not a slur on crypto - it’s what the issuer fraud data shows, and Visa’s issuer guidance on crypto fraud exists for a reason. Add account takeover, friendly fraud from customers who regret a trade, and dispute patterns that are hard to attribute, and you get a category where the fraud model eats the transaction margin before underwriting even starts.
- 05
Most banks won’t touch it. The acquiring bank carries the relationship, and most banks have a policy that says no crypto, or a policy so narrow it might as well. That’s the real constraint: not whether a processor says “high risk” on its homepage, but whether the bank behind it will sign. This is why a page that lists everyone “who supports crypto” is nearly useless, and why the same merchant gets three yeses from one list and eight nos from another.
None of that means crypto businesses can’t get accounts. It means they get accounts at the smaller number of banks that have decided to board the category - and that the file has to be built for those banks specifically.
Find my processor ↗04 / UNDERWRITING
What processors actually look at.
Seven things decide a crypto file. Everything else is conversation.
01MCC codes
The merchant category code drives interchange, which network rules apply, and which monitoring programme watches you. It’s assigned by the acquirer, not chosen by you, but it tells you how the acquirer has decided to see your risk.
6051 - Non-Financial Institutions: Foreign Currency, Money Orders, and Cryptocurrency. This is the quasi-cash code. A merchant selling crypto, or card-funding a crypto account, frequently has to use 6051 for those transactions even when they aren’t the merchant’s primary business. Other transactions at the same location use their own code.
6012 - Financial Institutions: Merchandise and Services. The financial-institution counterpart to 6051. If you’re a licensed financial business rather than a non-financial retailer, this is where you land.
The retail codes you already have. A supplement or travel brand accepting crypto alongside cards usually stays on its existing code, with the crypto leg handled by a gateway. Adding a crypto button should not, on its own, move you into a quasi-cash code - but ask, in writing, before you launch.
Continuity and specialty codes apply where they always did. A recurring billing model pulls you toward 5968, and gambling-adjacent flows pull toward 7995, regardless of how the payment is funded.
The practical question for a merchant is simple: ask which MCC will be registered for each flow, and get the answer in writing. An acquirer that codes your crypto volume as 6051 has decided that volume carries quasi-cash risk, and your pricing will show it. Visa’s Merchant Data Standards Manual is the source of record for the code descriptions.
02Licensing status
If you exchange or transmit value, this is the first thing underwriting checks and it will check it against public registers, not against your word. US MSB registration is searchable through FinCEN’s MSB registrant query; state licences are searchable through NMLS; EU CASP authorisations are published by ESMA. If your name isn’t where it should be, the file stops there.
03AML/KYC programme
Not whether you have a policy document, but whether you have a programme: a named compliance officer, risk-based customer due diligence, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, recordkeeping, and a suspicious activity reporting path. For anything touching crypto, add blockchain analytics or KYT - screening addresses against sanctioned and high-risk wallets - and, where applicable, Travel Rule handling for transfers above the relevant threshold. FATF’s updated virtual asset guidance is the reference standard regulators build from.
04Custody arrangements
Where the assets sit, who holds the keys, and whether the arrangement is insured. Hot wallet, cold storage, a third-party custodian, a regulated custodian - underwriting wants the map, not a sentence. Whose balance sheet is exposed if the wallet is drained, and what controls prevent it.
05Chargeback exposure
The card legs of your business are still card transactions. Your dispute ratio, fraud report ratio, refund rate and the trend across them get read like any other merchant’s. On-chain volume is separate - see the chargebacks section.
06Geography
Where you’re incorporated, where your customers are, which countries you serve and which you exclude. A US-incorporated merchant serving US customers at a documented address is one file. The same merchant with worldwide traffic from a one-page site is another. International card traffic on a US merchant is one of the fastest ways to get a reserve imposed.
07Fiat or crypto settlement
Whether you’re paid in dollars, in stablecoins, or in a volatile asset - and how often. Fiat settlement at a fixed schedule is the easiest file. Stablecoin settlement is workable and increasingly common. Settlement in a volatile asset requires the processor to price market risk, and many simply refuse it and settle in fiat instead.
Find my processor ↗05 / RATES AND RESERVES
What crypto processing actually costs.
These are the ranges we see across the crypto and crypto-adjacent merchants we place. Treat them as a benchmark to sanity-check a quote against, not a price list. Nothing here is an offer.
Two network numbers deserve their own table, because they’re what get an account terminated rather than merely repriced.
Read that carefully. Visa lowered the merchant threshold to 1.5% from 2.2% effective April 1, 2026, and the ratio folds reported fraud in with disputes - so a merchant with clean disputes and a fraud problem can trip it. Mastercard requires both the ratio and a minimum count, so a small merchant can post a scary percentage without qualifying. And crypto transactions do not enter the VAMP ratio. Only the card legs count.
One more check on any quote: a crypto-adjacent quote below roughly 2.5% on the card side usually means the processor hasn’t underwritten the quasi-cash exposure properly. It surfaces later - as a mid-contract rate review, a sudden reserve, a held payout or a shutdown notice.
Find my processor ↗06 / LICENSING
Licensing: the question that decides your file.
This section is general information, not legal advice. Licensing is fact-specific, it varies by state and country, and it changes. Confirm your own position with qualified counsel before you apply.
US businesses: FinCEN MSB registration
If you accept and transmit convertible virtual currency, or buy and sell it as a business, FinCEN’s guidance generally treats you as a money transmitter - a type of money services business. That’s the framework set out in FinCEN’s 2013 virtual currency guidance and expanded in its 2019 consolidated CVC guidance, unless an exception or limitation applies. Someone who merely buys crypto for their own account is a user, not an MSB.
If you’re in scope, expect to register with FinCEN, renew on the required cycle, and maintain an AML programme with recordkeeping and reporting duties. FinCEN’s MSB registration page lays out the mechanics, and you can check whether an entity is registered through the public MSB registrant search - which is exactly what an underwriter will do.
US businesses: state money transmitter licences
FinCEN registration is not a national licence. States license money transmission individually, and most applications run through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System rather than to each regulator separately. The CSBS Money Transmission Modernization Act is a model law that many states have adopted in full or in part to standardise requirements - but adoption is state by state, and adopting the model doesn’t license you anywhere by itself.
For an underwriter, the difference between “registered with FinCEN and licensed in the states we operate in” and “registered with FinCEN and still working through state applications” is a difference in risk appetite, not a technicality. Be precise about which is true.
EU-facing businesses: MiCA CASP authorisation
If you serve EU customers, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation replaced the patchwork of national regimes with a single authorisation for crypto-asset service providers. A CASP authorised in one member state can passport into others. ESMA’s MiCA page hosts the official register of authorised CASPs, and ESMA has published a supervisory briefing on CASP authorisations aimed at the national regulators doing the assessing. Transitional arrangements have been closing out, so an operation that leaned on grandfathering for the last few years needs to check where it stands now.
What documentation proves it
Underwriting doesn’t want a sentence. It wants the record:
- FinCEN MSB registration confirmation, with the registration number and renewal date
- State money transmitter licences, listed by state, with licence numbers - or a written explanation of the exemption you rely on
- MiCA CASP authorisation, with the home member state and the services covered
- Your AML/KYC policy, plus evidence it operates: a compliance officer, monitoring tooling, screening and reporting procedures
- Corporate documents that match the name on the licence
If any of that is missing, don’t paper over it. Say what you have, say what’s pending, and say when it lands. A disclosed gap is underwritable. A discovered one isn’t.
07 / CHARGEBACKS
Chargebacks work differently here.
This is the part of crypto payments that gets oversold, so let’s be exact.
01On-chain settlement is irreversible
Once a transaction is confirmed on the network, there is no chargeback, no dispute window and no issuer to arbitrate. The merchant holds the funds. That is the genuine advantage of crypto rails, and it’s why pure on-chain volume usually carries no rolling reserve - a reserve exists to cover future disputes, and there largely aren’t any.
02Card-funded crypto purchases can be charged back
If a customer buys crypto with a card, that’s a card transaction. It carries the full dispute lifecycle: the issuer can reverse it, and it lands on your record. The fact that the funds then moved into an asset doesn’t change the card leg’s exposure. This is where most crypto merchant losses actually come from.
03Hybrid flows carry both
A checkout that takes a card for part of the order and crypto for the rest gives you the worst of both: an irreversible leg you can’t refund through the network, and a reversible leg you can. If the customer disputes the whole order, you can only defend the crypto side - and defending it means showing the on-chain record alongside your terms.
04Visa’s thresholds count card transactions only
That’s not a loophole; it’s a definition. VAMP’s ratio is built from card fraud reports and card disputes against card settled transactions. Crypto volume doesn’t enter it. What that means in practice: adding crypto doesn’t dilute your card ratio, because the ratio was never measured against total volume. Only reducing card disputes or card volume changes it.
So the reserve is sized off the card side
A processor looking at a hybrid merchant asks what percentage of the revenue stream is card-funded, what the dispute rate is on that portion, and what the average ticket looks like - then holds a reserve against that exposure, not against the total. If 80% of your volume is on-chain and 20% is card, expect the reserve percentage to be discussed against the card leg, with total volume as context. Get that in writing, because it’s the difference between a 5% reserve on everything and a 5% reserve on the part that can actually be disputed.
One more thing worth knowing: irreversible doesn’t mean uncontested. A cardholder whose card funded a purchase they regret will dispute it, and a merchant who can’t produce KYC, an order record and a delivery proof will lose. Crypto rails remove the network’s reversal mechanic. They don’t remove the argument.
08 / ACCEPTING CRYPTO
Accepting crypto alongside cards.
If you’re in the third group - an ordinary high-risk merchant that wants to add a crypto button - here’s the honest version.
What it can do
Crypto acceptance routes some share of your customers off the card rails. That matters in categories where card volume is the problem: supplements with recurring billing, adult content, telemedicine, high-ticket services, anything running near a monitoring threshold. Every purchase that settles on-chain is a purchase that can’t generate a card dispute. Over a few months, a healthy crypto mix can pull your dispute ratio down simply by removing transactions that would otherwise have been card sales. Some merchants also find crypto converts elsewhere: customers in markets your card processor won’t serve, and customers who don’t want a subscription appearing on a statement description.
What it doesn’t do
It doesn’t fix a broken offer. If people are disputing because they didn’t know they were subscribing, they’ll also be unhappy buying with crypto - you just won’t see it as a chargeback, you’ll see it as a refund request and a bad review. It doesn’t lower your card rate. It doesn’t remove the need for a merchant account, because you still need one for the card leg. And it doesn’t retroactively clean a dispute history that’s already on your record.
How processors see it
Usually as a positive, with caveats. A processor evaluating a hybrid checkout likes that a share of volume is irreversible and that you’re giving customers an alternative to a dispute. It dislikes merchants who bolt on crypto without thinking through conversion, custody, refunds and the customer experience - because a crypto payment with no refund path generates support tickets, and support tickets escalate.
The practical setup for most merchants in this group is a high-risk merchant account for cards plus a crypto gateway for the on-chain leg, with both reporting into the same order record. You keep your card processor, you add a payment option, you reconcile the two. Ask your processor before you launch - some contracts have opinions about what else can appear at checkout, and it’s better to know on page eight of the agreement than after you’ve shipped the button.
09 / HOW IT WORKS
How the application works.
Six steps. A complete file typically gets a decision in 5 to 15 business days, and crypto files sit at the slower end because of the licensing verification. The variable is documentation, not the processor.
- 1
You submit the form - same day.
Six fields. We read it and come back with questions, usually the same day.
- 2
We classify the business - 1 to 2 days.
Selling crypto, exchanging crypto, or accepting crypto as payment. That classification determines everything that follows, and getting it wrong is what causes most declines.
- 3
You assemble the documentation pack - 3 to 7 days.
The list is below. Licensing proof and the custody map take longest, so start there.
- 4
We match you and you submit - same day to 2 days.
Two to four processors whose acquiring bank actually boards your category, at your volume, in your geography - with the reasoning attached. Apply to one or two, not ten. Every application leaves a record, and a cluster of simultaneous applications reads as distress.
- 5
Underwriting - 5 to 15 business days.
The processor reviews the file, usually asks one round of clarifications, and may run a site review and a register check against your licensing. Answer requests the same day. Files that stall usually stall because the merchant went quiet, not because the processor said no.
- 6
Approval, MID and the first reserve review - 1 to 5 days, then 30 to 90 days.
You get a merchant ID, gateway credentials and a settlement schedule. Confirm where the rolling reserve appears on your first statement, and confirm whether it’s calculated against card volume or total volume, so it isn’t a surprise on day one. Your first reserve review usually lands after one to three clean processing months.
- Business licence and entity formation documents
- EIN confirmation
- Government ID for the signer
- Licensing proof: FinCEN MSB registration, state money transmitter licences or MiCA CASP authorisation, as applicable
- Your AML/KYC policy, plus evidence of programme operation
- Bank statements, typically the last three to six months
- Custody arrangements: where assets sit, who holds keys, insurance, controls
- Processing statements from your current or previous processor, including card and crypto volumes separately
- A chargeback and refund history, with an explanation for anything elevated
- Website and checkout screenshots, including your refund policy and how the crypto option is presented
Throughout, keep one habit: never describe your business differently to a processor than your website describes it. If your site sells a subscription but the application says one-time purchases, the site wins and the account closes.
10 / GOOD QUESTIONS
Crypto merchant account questions.
Can a crypto business get a merchant account?
+
Yes, with processors whose acquiring bank has an explicit crypto or quasi-cash policy. That’s a smaller group than the pages listing “crypto-friendly processors” suggest, and most of those pages are comparing gateways rather than the banking relationship behind them. The constraint isn’t whether it’s possible. It’s how many banks will price your specific model - selling, exchanging or accepting - and what your licensing has to look like for them to say yes.
Why is crypto considered high risk?
+
Five reasons, and only one of them is about the technology. Regulatory rules differ by jurisdiction and keep moving. Licensing is often incomplete. Card-funded crypto attracts disproportionate fraud. Settlement value can move sharply between authorization and payout. And most acquiring banks simply have a policy against the category. Underwriters price the combination, not the word “crypto.”
What rates should I expect for crypto payment processing?
+
Card legs on crypto-adjacent, high-risk merchants typically run 3% to 6% per transaction. Crypto gateway fees typically run 0.5% to 2%. Rolling reserves of 5% to 10% held for 90 to 180 days are normal wherever cards are involved; pure on-chain settlement usually carries no reserve. A card-side quote below roughly 2.5% in this category usually means the processor hasn’t underwritten the quasi-cash exposure properly.
What is a rolling reserve?
+
A percentage of your monthly volume the processor holds back to cover future chargebacks, refunds and disputes. Typical crypto-adjacent reserves run 5% to 10%, held for 90 to 180 days, then released on a rolling basis - so a 10% reserve held for 180 days means each month’s 10% comes back roughly six months later, provided the account stays clean. Where a checkout mixes card and on-chain volume, ask whether the reserve applies to card volume or total volume. That single clause is worth more than a percentage point of rate.
Do I need a money transmitter licence?
+
It depends on what you actually do. If you only accept crypto as payment for goods or services, you’re usually outside the money transmitter framework. If you accept and transmit convertible virtual currency, or buy and sell it as a business, FinCEN’s guidance generally treats you as a money transmitter - an MSB - subject to registration and an AML programme, unless an exception applies, and most states then require their own licence on top. This is general information, not legal advice. Get your own position confirmed in writing by counsel before you apply.
Can I accept crypto without a processor?
+
Technically, yes - you can publish a wallet address and take payment directly to it. Practically, it’s usually a bad idea for anything at scale. You’d be handling conversion, price volatility between order and payment, refunds, reconciliation, and the compliance questions that come with receiving value from unknown counterparties. Most merchants use a gateway for exactly those reasons: it screens addresses, converts on a schedule and gives you an order record you can defend. The gateway is not a merchant account, though. If you also take cards, you still need one.
What if I’ve been declined?
+
A decline isn’t a permanent mark, but it needs an explanation attached to it. Work out which of the three businesses you actually are, then find out what killed the file - the classification, the licensing, the custody arrangement, the geography, or a bank with no crypto policy. Fix the cause before you apply again, and don’t shotgun applications across five processors at once. If a previous account was shut down or a reserve was held, disclose it. Processors price disclosed history. They decline discovered history.
How long does approval take?
+
A complete crypto application usually gets a decision in 5 to 15 business days, and the crypto files run slower than ordinary high-risk files because underwriting verifies licensing against public registers rather than taking your word for it. Get your entity documents, EIN, licensing proof, AML policy, bank statements and processing history ready before you submit, and you sit at the fast end. Let underwriting chase paperwork and you sit at the slow end, often re-underwritten from scratch.
Does accepting crypto reduce my chargebacks?
+
Partly, and less than the marketing suggests. On-chain transactions can’t be charged back, so every purchase that settles on-chain is a purchase that can’t become a card dispute. But Visa’s monitoring ratio counts card transactions only - crypto volume doesn’t enter the calculation - so adding crypto doesn’t dilute your existing ratio. It changes the ratio only by reducing the number of card disputes, or the card volume they’re measured against. It also doesn’t fix a fundamentally bad offer: unhappy customers dispute differently, they just don’t do it through the card network.
What about stablecoins?
+
Stablecoins are where a lot of crypto settlement is heading, and for good reason. A dollar-denominated stablecoin removes the volatility problem that makes volatile-asset settlement hard to underwrite, so processors are more comfortable with it and pricing tends to sit at the lower end of the 0.5% to 2% gateway range. It does not remove the compliance layer: KYC and KYB at onboarding, blockchain analytics and address screening, and Travel Rule handling where transfers exceed the applicable threshold all still apply. Settlement in a stablecoin is still crypto settlement, and it still has to be reconciled against fiat payouts on a schedule you can prove.
11 / NEXT STEP
Let’s find your processor.
Tell us what the business actually does - whether you sell crypto, exchange it, or simply want to accept it - plus your licensing position, your volume and your checkout. We’ll come back with the processors that fit, tell you plainly when one doesn’t, and prep the documentation with you before anything goes to underwriting.
Crypto is one of several verticals we cover - browse the full list of high-risk payment processing industries.
Free to use · Team responds ASAP · We’re paid by the processor, not you.